updated documentation
This commit is contained in:
parent
da8026df9d
commit
827e7d7c1d
303
README.md
303
README.md
@ -1,17 +1,51 @@
|
||||
#node-postgres
|
||||
|
||||
100% javascript. 100% async. 100% would love your contributions.
|
||||
Non-blocking (async) JavaScript PostgreSQL client for node.js written fully TDD
|
||||
|
||||
## ALPHA version
|
||||
## alpha version
|
||||
|
||||
Implemented in a fully TDD fashion. I'm aiming for
|
||||
extremely high quality code, but first doing the implementation and
|
||||
only refactoring after tests are in place.
|
||||
### Whirlwind tour
|
||||
|
||||
##### Installation
|
||||
var Client = require('node-postgres').Client;
|
||||
var client = new Client({
|
||||
user: 'brianc',
|
||||
database: 'test',
|
||||
password: 'boom' //plaintext or md5 supported
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Clone the repo. There are __no__ dependencies.
|
||||
client.connect();
|
||||
|
||||
var printRow = function(row) {
|
||||
console.log(row.fields);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
var simpleQuery = client.query("select * from user where heart = 'big'");
|
||||
simpleQuery.on('row', printRow);
|
||||
|
||||
var preparedStatement = client.query({
|
||||
name: 'user by heart type',
|
||||
text: 'select * from user where heart = $1',
|
||||
values: ['big']
|
||||
});
|
||||
preparedStatement.on('row', printRow);
|
||||
|
||||
var cachedPreparedStatement = client.query({
|
||||
name: 'user by heart type',
|
||||
values: ['filled with kisses']
|
||||
});
|
||||
cachedPreparedStatement.on('row', printRow);
|
||||
|
||||
cachedPreparedStatement.on('end', client.end());
|
||||
|
||||
### Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
* well tested
|
||||
* no monkey patching
|
||||
* no dependencies (well...besides PostgreSQL)
|
||||
|
||||
### Installation
|
||||
|
||||
Clone the repo.
|
||||
|
||||
git clone git://github.com/brianc/node-postgres
|
||||
cd node-postgres
|
||||
@ -19,262 +53,35 @@ Clone the repo. There are __no__ dependencies.
|
||||
|
||||
And just like magic, you're ready to contribute! <3
|
||||
|
||||
I don't have _style guidelines_ or anything right now. I'm 100x more
|
||||
concerned with test coverage, functionality, and happy coding than I
|
||||
am about whether or not you've got the proper spacing after your `{ hash: 'separators' }`
|
||||
## More info please
|
||||
|
||||
### Connection
|
||||
Srsly check out the [[wiki]]. MUCH more information there.
|
||||
|
||||
The connection object is a 1 to 1 mapping to the [postgres
|
||||
client/server messaging protocol](http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/protocol.html).
|
||||
The __Connection_ object is mostly used by the Client object (which...I haven't yet
|
||||
finished implementing) but you can do anything you want with PostgreSQL using
|
||||
the connection object if you're really into that. I studied the
|
||||
protocol for a while implementing this and the documentation is pretty
|
||||
solid. If you're already familiar you should be right at home. Have
|
||||
fun looking up the [oids for the datatypes in your bound queries](http://github.com/brianc/node-postgres/blob/master/script/list-db-types.js)
|
||||
p.s. want your own offline version of the wiki?
|
||||
|
||||
There are a few minor variations from the protocol:
|
||||
git clone git://github.com/brianc/node-postgres.wiki.git
|
||||
|
||||
- The connection only supports 'text' mode right now.
|
||||
- Renamed 'passwordMessage' to 'password'
|
||||
- Renamed 'startupMessage' to 'startup'
|
||||
- Renamed 'errorResposne' to 'error'
|
||||
- Renamed 'noticeResponce' to 'notice'
|
||||
__github is magic__
|
||||
|
||||
The reason for the renamings is 90% of the message names in the
|
||||
protocol do no contain "message" "request" "response" or anything
|
||||
similar, and I feel it's a bit redundant to send a "passwordMessage
|
||||
message." But then again...[I do say ATM machine](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAS_syndrome).
|
||||
|
||||
Anyways...using a connection directly is a pretty verbose and
|
||||
cumbersom affair. Here's an example of executing a prepared query
|
||||
using the directly __Connection__ api in compliance with
|
||||
PostgreSQL.
|
||||
|
||||
_note: this works and is taken directly from an integration test;
|
||||
however, it doesn't include error handling_
|
||||
|
||||
var con = new Connection({stream: new net.Stream()});
|
||||
|
||||
con.connect('5432','localhost');
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('connect', function() {
|
||||
|
||||
con.startup({
|
||||
user: username,
|
||||
database: database
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('readyForQuery', function() {
|
||||
|
||||
con.query('create temp table ids(id integer)');
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('readyForQuery', function() {
|
||||
|
||||
con.query('insert into ids(id) values(1); insert into ids(id) values(2);');
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('readyForQuery', function() {
|
||||
|
||||
con.parse({
|
||||
text: 'select * from ids'
|
||||
});
|
||||
con.flush();
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('parseComplete', function() {
|
||||
con.bind();
|
||||
con.flush();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('bindComplete', function() {
|
||||
con.execute();
|
||||
con.flush();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('commandComplete', function() {
|
||||
con.sync();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
con.once('readyForQuery', function() {
|
||||
con.end();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Client
|
||||
|
||||
Basically a facade on top of the connection to provide a _much_ more
|
||||
user friendly, "node style" interface for doing all the lovely things
|
||||
you like with PostgreSQL.
|
||||
|
||||
Now that I've got the __Connection__ api in place, the bulk and meat of
|
||||
the work is being done on the __Client__ to provide the best possible
|
||||
API. Help? Yes please!
|
||||
|
||||
var client = new Client({
|
||||
user: 'brian',
|
||||
database: 'postgres',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
client.query("create temp table ids(id integer)");
|
||||
client.query("insert into ids(id) values(1)");
|
||||
client.query("insert into ids(id) values(2)");
|
||||
var query = client.query("select * from ids", function(row) {
|
||||
row.fields[0] // <- that equals 1 the first time. 2 the second time.
|
||||
});
|
||||
query.on('end', function() {
|
||||
client.end();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
#### Prepared statements
|
||||
|
||||
I'm still working on the API for prepared statements. Check out the
|
||||
tests for more up to date examples, but what I'm working towards is
|
||||
something like this:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
var client = new Client({
|
||||
user: 'brian',
|
||||
database: 'test'
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
var query = client.query({
|
||||
text: 'select * from person where age < $1',
|
||||
values: [21]
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
query.on('row', function(row) {
|
||||
console.log(row);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
query.on('end', function() { client.end() });
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
The tests are split up into two different Unit test and
|
||||
integration tests.
|
||||
|
||||
### Unit tests
|
||||
|
||||
Unit tests do not depend on having access to a
|
||||
running PostgreSQL server. They work by mocking out the `net.Stream`
|
||||
instance into a `MemoryStream`. The memory stream raises 'data'
|
||||
events with pre-populated packets which simulate communcation from an
|
||||
actual PostgreSQL server. Some tests will validate incomming packets
|
||||
are parsed correctly by the __Connection__ and some tests validate the
|
||||
__Connection__ correctly sends outgoing packets to the stream.
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration tests
|
||||
|
||||
The integration tests operate on an actual database and require
|
||||
access. They're under a bit more flux as the api for the client is
|
||||
changing a bit; however, they should always all be passing on every
|
||||
push up to the ol' githubber.
|
||||
### Running tests
|
||||
|
||||
You can run any test file directly by doing the `node
|
||||
test/unit/connection/inbound-parser-tests.js` or something of the
|
||||
like.
|
||||
|
||||
However, you can specify command line arguments after the file
|
||||
and they will be picked up and used in the tests. None of the
|
||||
arguments are used in _unit_ tests, so you're safe to just blast away
|
||||
with the command like above, but if you'd like to execute an
|
||||
_integration_ test, you outta specifiy your database, user to use for
|
||||
testing, and optionally a password.
|
||||
|
||||
To do so you would do something like so:
|
||||
|
||||
node test/integration/client/simple-query-tests.js -u brian -d test_db
|
||||
|
||||
If you'd like to execute all the unit or integration tests at one
|
||||
time, you can do so with the "run.js" script in the /test directory as
|
||||
follows:
|
||||
|
||||
##### Run all unit tests
|
||||
|
||||
node test/run.js -t unit
|
||||
|
||||
or optionally, since `-t unit` is the default
|
||||
|
||||
node test/run.js
|
||||
|
||||
##### Run all integration tests
|
||||
|
||||
node test/run.js -t integration -u brian -d test_db --password password!
|
||||
|
||||
##### Run all the tests!
|
||||
|
||||
node test/run.js -t all -u brian -d test_db --password password!
|
||||
|
||||
In short, I tried to make executing the tests as easy as possible.
|
||||
Hopefully this will encourage you to fork, hack, and do whatever you
|
||||
please as you've got a nice, big safety net under you.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Test data
|
||||
|
||||
In order for the integration tests to not take ages to run, I've
|
||||
pulled out the script used to generate test data. This way you can
|
||||
generate a "test" database once and don't have to up/down the tables
|
||||
every time an integration test runs. To run the generation script,
|
||||
execute the script with the same command line arguments passed to any
|
||||
other test script.
|
||||
|
||||
node script/create-test-tables.js -u user -d database
|
||||
|
||||
Aditionally if you want to revert the test data, you'll need to "down"
|
||||
the database first and then re-create the data as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
node script/create-test-tables.js -u user -d database --down
|
||||
node script/create-test-tables.js -u user -d database
|
||||
|
||||
## TODO
|
||||
- Query results returned
|
||||
- some way to return number of rows inserted/updated etc
|
||||
(supported in protocol and handled in __Connection__ but not sure
|
||||
where on the __Client__ api to add this functionality)
|
||||
- Typed result set support in client
|
||||
- simple queries
|
||||
- bound commands
|
||||
- edge cases
|
||||
- [numeric 'NaN' result](http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/datatype-numeric.html)
|
||||
- float Infinity, -Infinity
|
||||
- Error handling
|
||||
- disconnection, removal of listeners on errors
|
||||
- passing errors to callbacks?
|
||||
- more integration testing
|
||||
- bound command support in client
|
||||
- type specification
|
||||
- parameter specification
|
||||
- transparent bound command caching?
|
||||
- nice "cursor" (portal) api
|
||||
- connection pooling
|
||||
- copy data?
|
||||
- kiss the sky
|
||||
|
||||
## Why?
|
||||
### Why?
|
||||
|
||||
As soon as I saw node.js for the first time I knew I had found
|
||||
something lovely and simple and _just what I always wanted!_. So...I
|
||||
poked around for a while. I was excited. I told my friend "ah man
|
||||
the only thing holding node back is a really solid data access story."
|
||||
I mean...let's put the NoSQL debate aside. Let's say for arguments
|
||||
sake you have to run a query from node.js on PostgreSQL before the
|
||||
poked around for a while. I was excited. I still am!
|
||||
|
||||
Let's say for arguments sake you have to run a query from node.js on PostgreSQL before the
|
||||
last petal falls off the rose and you are stuck as a beast forever?
|
||||
You can't use NoSQL because your boss said he'd pour a cup of
|
||||
Hoegarten into your laptop fan vent and you _hate_ that beer?
|
||||
What if your entire production site depends on it? Well, fret no
|
||||
more. And let [GastonDB](http://www.snipetts.com/ashley/mymusicals/disney/beauty-an-beast/images/gaston.gif) be vanquished.
|
||||
|
||||
I drew major inspiration from
|
||||
[postgres-js](http://github.com/creationix/postgres-js). I didn't
|
||||
just fork and contribute because it has
|
||||
__0__ tests included with it and doesn't seem to be actively developed
|
||||
anymore. I am not comfortable forking & playing with a project
|
||||
without having a way to run a test suite, let alone using it in
|
||||
production.
|
||||
_0_ tests included with it, adds a bunch of methods to the Buffer()
|
||||
object, and doesn't seem to be maintained. Still...was a lovely way
|
||||
to learn & excellent reference material.
|
||||
|
||||
I also drew some major inspirrado from
|
||||
[node-mysql](http://github.com/felixge/node-mysql) and liked what I
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user