Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vladimir Agafonkin
9c2e7cfbd4 add Point contains method 2013-02-22 17:28:55 +02:00
John Firebaugh
01332ebead Omit "should" in spec descriptions
The rationale is this: the spec string describes the expected
behavior unconditionally. The code examples, on the other hand,
set up an expectation that is tested with the call to the expect
method. The code examples can violate the expectation, but the
spec string does not. The value of the spec string is as clearly
as possible describing the behavior. Including “should” in that
description adds no value. (From http://rubyspec.org/style_guide/)
2013-02-19 12:41:48 -08:00
Vladimir Agafonkin
17cf297c9b complete geometry tests to 100% #1347 2013-02-05 13:51:27 +02:00
mourner
a2d2fed2db new Point methods 2010-09-17 19:04:41 +03:00
mourner
06d043853d multiplyBy 2010-09-15 16:45:02 +03:00
mourner
59a1736b3e Point fixes 2010-09-13 14:58:03 +03:00
mourner
a8d55d0d47 Point add/subtract/divideBy 2010-09-10 16:54:03 +03:00
mourner
7a1dcd9915 Transformation & Point classes, more specs 2010-09-02 18:23:53 +03:00