mirror of
https://github.com/davisking/dlib.git
synced 2024-11-01 10:14:53 +08:00
150 lines
6.8 KiB
Python
Executable File
150 lines
6.8 KiB
Python
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/python
|
|
# The contents of this file are in the public domain. See LICENSE_FOR_EXAMPLE_PROGRAMS.txt
|
|
#
|
|
#
|
|
# This is an example illustrating the use of the SVM-Rank tool from the dlib C++
|
|
# Library. This is a tool useful for learning to rank objects. For example,
|
|
# you might use it to learn to rank web pages in response to a user's query.
|
|
# The idea being to rank the most relevant pages higher than non-relevant pages.
|
|
#
|
|
# In this example, we will create a simple test dataset and show how to learn a
|
|
# ranking function from it. The purpose of the function will be to give
|
|
# "relevant" objects higher scores than "non-relevant" objects. The idea is
|
|
# that you use this score to order the objects so that the most relevant objects
|
|
# come to the top of the ranked list.
|
|
#
|
|
# COMPILING THE DLIB PYTHON INTERFACE
|
|
# Dlib comes with a compiled python interface for python 2.7 on MS Windows. If
|
|
# you are using another python version or operating system then you need to
|
|
# compile the dlib python interface before you can use this file. To do this,
|
|
# run compile_dlib_python_module.bat. This should work on any operating system
|
|
# so long as you have CMake and boost-python installed. On Ubuntu, this can be
|
|
# done easily by running the command: sudo apt-get install libboost-python-dev cmake
|
|
|
|
|
|
import dlib
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now let's make some testing data. To make it really simple, let's suppose that
|
|
# we are ranking 2D vectors and that vectors with positive values in the first
|
|
# dimension should rank higher than other vectors. So what we do is make
|
|
# examples of relevant (i.e. high ranking) and non-relevant (i.e. low ranking)
|
|
# vectors and store them into a ranking_pair object like so:
|
|
|
|
data = dlib.ranking_pair()
|
|
# Here we add two examples. In real applications, you would want lots of
|
|
# examples of relevant and non-relevant vectors.
|
|
data.relevant.append(dlib.vector([1, 0]))
|
|
data.nonrelevant.append(dlib.vector([0, 1]))
|
|
|
|
# Now that we have some data, we can use a machine learning method to learn a
|
|
# function that will give high scores to the relevant vectors and low scores to
|
|
# the non-relevant vectors.
|
|
trainer = dlib.svm_rank_trainer()
|
|
# Note that the trainer object has some parameters that control how it behaves.
|
|
# For example, since this is the SVM-Rank algorithm it has a C parameter that
|
|
# controls the trade-off between trying to fit the training data exactly or
|
|
# selecting a "simpler" solution which might generalize better.
|
|
trainer.c = 10
|
|
|
|
# So let's do the training.
|
|
rank = trainer.train(data)
|
|
|
|
# Now if you call rank on a vector it will output a ranking score. In
|
|
# particular, the ranking score for relevant vectors should be larger than the
|
|
# score for non-relevant vectors.
|
|
print "ranking score for a relevant vector: ", rank(data.relevant[0])
|
|
print "ranking score for a non-relevant vector: ", rank(data.nonrelevant[0])
|
|
# The output is the following:
|
|
# ranking score for a relevant vector: 0.5
|
|
# ranking score for a non-relevant vector: -0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If we want an overall measure of ranking accuracy we can compute the ordering
|
|
# accuracy and mean average precision values by calling test_ranking_function().
|
|
# In this case, the ordering accuracy tells us how often a non-relevant vector
|
|
# was ranked ahead of a relevant vector. In this case, it returns 1 for both
|
|
# metrics, indicating that the rank function outputs a perfect ranking.
|
|
print dlib.test_ranking_function(rank, data)
|
|
|
|
# The ranking scores are computed by taking the dot product between a learned
|
|
# weight vector and a data vector. If you want to see the learned weight vector
|
|
# you can display it like so:
|
|
print "weights: \n", rank.weights
|
|
# In this case the weights are:
|
|
# 0.5
|
|
# -0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# In the above example, our data contains just two sets of objects. The
|
|
# relevant set and non-relevant set. The trainer is attempting to find a
|
|
# ranking function that gives every relevant vector a higher score than every
|
|
# non-relevant vector. Sometimes what you want to do is a little more complex
|
|
# than this.
|
|
#
|
|
# For example, in the web page ranking example we have to rank pages based on a
|
|
# user's query. In this case, each query will have its own set of relevant and
|
|
# non-relevant documents. What might be relevant to one query may well be
|
|
# non-relevant to another. So in this case we don't have a single global set of
|
|
# relevant web pages and another set of non-relevant web pages.
|
|
#
|
|
# To handle cases like this, we can simply give multiple ranking_pair instances
|
|
# to the trainer. Therefore, each ranking_pair would represent the
|
|
# relevant/non-relevant sets for a particular query. An example is shown below
|
|
# (for simplicity, we reuse our data from above to make 4 identical "queries").
|
|
|
|
queries = dlib.ranking_pairs()
|
|
queries.append(data)
|
|
queries.append(data)
|
|
queries.append(data)
|
|
queries.append(data)
|
|
|
|
# We can train just as before.
|
|
rank = trainer.train(queries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Now that we have multiple ranking_pair instances, we can also use
|
|
# cross_validate_ranking_trainer(). This performs cross-validation by splitting
|
|
# the queries up into folds. That is, it lets the trainer train on a subset of
|
|
# ranking_pair instances and tests on the rest. It does this over 4 different
|
|
# splits and returns the overall ranking accuracy based on the held out data.
|
|
# Just like test_ranking_function(), it reports both the ordering accuracy and
|
|
# mean average precision.
|
|
print "cross validation results: ", dlib.cross_validate_ranking_trainer(trainer, queries, 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Finally, note that the ranking tools also support the use of sparse vectors in
|
|
# addition to dense vectors (which we used above). So if we wanted to do
|
|
# exactly what we did in the first part of the example program above but using
|
|
# sparse vectors we would do it like so:
|
|
|
|
data = dlib.sparse_ranking_pair()
|
|
samp = dlib.sparse_vector()
|
|
|
|
# Make samp represent the same vector as dlib.vector([1, 0]). In dlib, a sparse
|
|
# vector is just an array of pair objects. Each pair stores an index and a
|
|
# value. Moreover, the svm-ranking tools require sparse vectors to be sorted
|
|
# and to have unique indices. This means that the indices are listed in
|
|
# increasing order and no index value shows up more than once. If necessary,
|
|
# you can use the dlib.make_sparse_vector() routine to make a sparse vector
|
|
# object properly sorted and contain unique indices.
|
|
samp.append(dlib.pair(0,1))
|
|
data.relevant.append(samp)
|
|
|
|
# Now make samp represent the same vector as dlib.vector([0, 1])
|
|
samp.clear()
|
|
samp.append(dlib.pair(1,1))
|
|
data.nonrelevant.append(samp)
|
|
|
|
trainer = dlib.svm_rank_trainer_sparse()
|
|
rank = trainer.train(data)
|
|
print "ranking score for a relevant vector: ", rank(data.relevant[0])
|
|
print "ranking score for a non-relevant vector: ", rank(data.nonrelevant[0])
|
|
# Just as before, the output is the following:
|
|
# ranking score for a relevant vector: 0.5
|
|
# ranking score for a non-relevant vector: -0.5
|
|
|