mirror of
https://github.com/davisking/dlib.git
synced 2024-11-01 10:14:53 +08:00
754da0ef3c
--HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3Afdd8eb12-d10e-0410-9acb-85c331704f74/trunk%402199
171 lines
7.5 KiB
C++
171 lines
7.5 KiB
C++
/*
|
|
|
|
This is an example illustrating the use of the support vector machine
|
|
utilities from the dlib C++ Library.
|
|
|
|
This example creates a simple set of data to train on and then shows
|
|
you how to use the cross validation and svm training functions
|
|
to find a good decision function that can classify examples in our
|
|
data set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The data used in this example will be 2 dimensional data and will
|
|
come from a distribution where points with a distance less than 10
|
|
from the origin are labeled +1 and all other points are labeled
|
|
as -1.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
#include "dlib/svm.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace std;
|
|
using namespace dlib;
|
|
|
|
|
|
int main()
|
|
{
|
|
// The svm functions use column vectors to contain a lot of the data they operate on
|
|
// So the first thing we do here is declare some convenient typedefs for matrix objects
|
|
// we will be using.
|
|
|
|
// This first typedef declares a matrix with 2 rows and 1 column. It will be the
|
|
// object that contains each of our 2 dimensional samples. (Note that if you wanted
|
|
// more than 2 features in this vector you can simply change the 2 to something else)
|
|
typedef matrix<double, 2, 1> sample_type;
|
|
|
|
// This is a typedef for a column vector of unknown length that contains our
|
|
// sample_type objects. Instances of this object will contain our sample data.
|
|
typedef matrix<sample_type,0,1> samples_type;
|
|
|
|
// This is a typedef for the type of kernel we are going to use in this example.
|
|
// In this case I have selected the radial basis kernel that can operate on our
|
|
// 2D sample_type objects
|
|
typedef radial_basis_kernel<sample_type> kernel_type;
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now we make a samples_type object as well as a column vector to
|
|
// store the label for each sample in samples.
|
|
samples_type samples;
|
|
matrix<double, 0,1> labels;
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now lets put some data into our samples and labels objects. We do this
|
|
// by looping over 41*41 points and labeling them according to their
|
|
// distance from the origin.
|
|
samples.set_size(41*41);
|
|
labels.set_size(41*41);
|
|
int count = 0;
|
|
for (int r = -20; r <= 20; ++r)
|
|
{
|
|
for (int c = -20; c <= 20; ++c)
|
|
{
|
|
samples(count)(0) = r;
|
|
samples(count)(1) = c;
|
|
|
|
// if this point is less than 10 from the origin
|
|
if (sqrt((double)r*r + c*c) <= 10)
|
|
labels(count) = +1;
|
|
else
|
|
labels(count) = -1;
|
|
|
|
++count;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we have some data we want to train on it. However, there are two parameters to the
|
|
// training. These are the nu and gamma parameters. Our choice for these parameters will
|
|
// influence how good the resulting decision function is. To test how good a particular choice
|
|
// of these parameters are we can use the svm_nu_cross_validate() function to perform n-fold cross
|
|
// validation on our training data. However, there is a problem with the way we have sampled
|
|
// our distribution above. The problem is that there is a definite ordering to the samples.
|
|
// That is, the first half of the samples look like they are from a different distribution
|
|
// than the second half do. This would screw up the cross validation process but we can
|
|
// fix it by randomizing the order of the samples with the following function call.
|
|
randomize_samples(samples, labels);
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The nu parameter has a maximum value that is dependent on the ratio of the +1 to -1
|
|
// labels in the training data. This function finds that value.
|
|
const double max_nu = maximum_nu(labels);
|
|
|
|
// Now we loop over some different nu and gamma values to see how good they are. Note
|
|
// that this is just a simple brute force way to try out a few possible parameter
|
|
// choices. You may want to investigate more sophisticated strategies for determining
|
|
// good parameter choices.
|
|
cout << "doing cross validation" << endl;
|
|
for (double gamma = 0.00001; gamma <= 1; gamma += 0.1)
|
|
{
|
|
for (double nu = 0.00001; nu < max_nu; nu += 0.1)
|
|
{
|
|
cout << "gamma: " << gamma << " nu: " << nu;
|
|
// Print out the cross validation accuracy for 3-fold cross validation using the current gamma and nu.
|
|
// svm_nu_cross_validate() returns a column vector. The first element of the vector is the fraction
|
|
// of +1 training examples correctly classified and the second number is the fraction of -1 training
|
|
// examples correctly classified.
|
|
cout << " cross validation accuracy: " << svm_nu_cross_validate(samples, labels, kernel_type(gamma), nu, 3);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// From looking at the output of the above loop it turns out that a good value for
|
|
// nu and gamma for this problem is 0.1 for both. So that is what we will use.
|
|
|
|
// Now we train on the full set of data and obtain the resulting decision function. We use the
|
|
// value of 0.1 for nu and gamma. The decision function will return values >= 0 for samples it predicts
|
|
// are in the +1 class and numbers < 0 for samples it predicts to be in the -1 class.
|
|
decision_function<kernel_type> learned_decision_function = svm_nu_train(samples, labels, kernel_type(0.1), 0.1);
|
|
|
|
// print out the number of support vectors in the resulting decision function
|
|
cout << "\nnumber of support vectors in our learned_decision_function is " << learned_decision_function.support_vectors.nr() << endl;
|
|
|
|
// now lets try this decision_function on some samples we haven't seen before
|
|
sample_type sample;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 3.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 2;
|
|
cout << "This sample should be >= 0 and it is classified as a " << learned_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 3.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 9.3545;
|
|
cout << "This sample should be >= 0 and it is classified as a " << learned_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 13.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 9.3545;
|
|
cout << "This sample should be < 0 and it is classified as a " << learned_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 13.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 0;
|
|
cout << "This sample should be < 0 and it is classified as a " << learned_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We can also train a decision function that reports a well conditioned probability instead of just a number
|
|
// > 0 for the +1 class and < 0 for the -1 class. An example of doing that follows:
|
|
probabilistic_decision_function<kernel_type> learned_probabilistic_decision_function = svm_nu_train_prob(samples, labels, kernel_type(0.1), 0.1, 3);
|
|
|
|
// print out the number of support vectors in the resulting decision function. (it should be the same as in the one above)
|
|
cout << "\nnumber of support vectors in our learned_probabilistic_decision_function is "
|
|
<< learned_probabilistic_decision_function.decision_funct.support_vectors.nr() << endl;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 3.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 2;
|
|
cout << "This +1 example should have high probability. It's probability is: " << learned_probabilistic_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 3.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 9.3545;
|
|
cout << "This +1 example should have high probability. It's probability is: " << learned_probabilistic_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 13.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 9.3545;
|
|
cout << "This -1 example should have low probability. It's probability is: " << learned_probabilistic_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
sample(0) = 13.123;
|
|
sample(1) = 0;
|
|
cout << "This -1 example should have low probability. It's probability is: " << learned_probabilistic_decision_function(sample) << endl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|