mirror of
https://github.com/vector-im/element-web.git
synced 2024-11-25 09:58:11 +08:00
72 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
72 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
|
# The CIDER (Contenteditable-Input-Diff-Error-Reconcile) editor
|
||
|
|
||
|
The CIDER editor is a custom editor written for Element.
|
||
|
Most of the code can be found in the `/editor/` directory.
|
||
|
It is used to power the composer main composer (both to send and edit messages), and might be used for other usecases where autocomplete is desired (invite box, ...).
|
||
|
|
||
|
## High-level overview.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The editor is backed by a model that contains parts.
|
||
|
A part has some text and a type (plain text, pill, ...). When typing in the editor,
|
||
|
the model validates the input and updates the parts.
|
||
|
The parts are then reconciled with the DOM.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Inner workings
|
||
|
|
||
|
When typing in the `contenteditable` element, the `input` event fires and
|
||
|
the DOM of the editor is turned into a string. The way this is done has
|
||
|
some logic to it to deal with adding newlines for block elements, to make sure
|
||
|
the caret offset is calculated in the same way as the content string, and to ignore
|
||
|
caret nodes (more on that later).
|
||
|
For these reasons it doesn't use `innerText`, `textContent` or anything similar.
|
||
|
The model addresses any content in the editor within as an offset within this string.
|
||
|
The caret position is thus also converted from a position in the DOM tree
|
||
|
to an offset in the content string. This happens in `getCaretOffsetAndText` in `dom.ts`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Once the content string and caret offset is calculated, it is passed to the `update()`
|
||
|
method of the model. The model first calculates the same content string of its current parts,
|
||
|
basically just concatenating their text. It then looks for differences between
|
||
|
the current and the new content string. The diffing algorithm is very basic,
|
||
|
and assumes there is only one change around the caret offset,
|
||
|
so this should be very inexpensive. See `diff.ts` for details.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The result of the diffing is the strings that were added and/or removed from
|
||
|
the current content. These differences are then applied to the parts,
|
||
|
where parts can apply validation logic to these changes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For example, if you type an @ in some plain text, the plain text part rejects
|
||
|
that character, and this character is then presented to the part creator,
|
||
|
which will turn it into a pill candidate part.
|
||
|
Pill candidate parts are what opens the auto completion, and upon picking a completion,
|
||
|
replace themselves with an actual pill which can't be edited anymore.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The diffing is needed to preserve state in the parts apart from their text
|
||
|
(which is the only thing the model receives from the DOM), e.g. to build
|
||
|
the model incrementally. Any text that didn't change is assumed
|
||
|
to leave the parts it intersects alone.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The benefit of this is that we can use the `input` event, which is broadly supported,
|
||
|
to find changes in the editor. We don't have to rely on keyboard events,
|
||
|
which relate poorly to text input or changes, and don't need the `beforeinput` event,
|
||
|
which isn't broadly supported yet.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Once the parts of the model are updated, the DOM of the editor is then reconciled
|
||
|
with the new model state, see `renderModel` in `render.ts` for this.
|
||
|
If the model didn't reject the input and didn't make any additional changes,
|
||
|
this won't make any changes to the DOM at all, and should thus be fairly efficient.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For the browser to allow the user to place the caret between two pills,
|
||
|
or between a pill and the start and end of the line, we need some extra DOM nodes.
|
||
|
These DOM nodes are called caret nodes, and contain an invisble character, so
|
||
|
the caret can be placed into them. The model is unaware of caret nodes, and they
|
||
|
are only added to the DOM during the render phase. Likewise, when calculating
|
||
|
the content string, caret nodes need to be ignored, as they would confuse the model.
|
||
|
|
||
|
As part of the reconciliation, the caret position is also adjusted to any changes
|
||
|
the model made to the input. The caret is passed around in two formats.
|
||
|
The model receives the caret _offset_ within the content string (which includes
|
||
|
an atNodeEnd flag to make it unambiguous if it is at a part and or the next part start).
|
||
|
The model converts this to a caret _position_ internally, which has a partIndex
|
||
|
and an offset within the part text, which is more natural to work with.
|
||
|
From there on, the caret _position_ is used, also during reconciliation.
|