Added the Cmake option OSG_USE_LOCAL_LUA_SOURCE to control whether to build and use the Lua source code in the lua plugin, or look for lua as an external dependency.
To the Lua plugin added support for assigned lua functions to C++ osg::Objects via the new osg::CallbackObject mechanism. To invoke the scripts function from C++ one must get the CallbackObject and call run on it.
Renamed ScriptCallback to ScriptNodeCallback to avoid possibly confusion between osg::CallbackObject and the ScriptNodeCallback.
From Robert Osfield, changed the example so that the vertical and horizon scalar bars are rotated to the XZ plane so you can see them with the default viewer's camera orientation.
Tweaked the positioning of title text of vertic scalar bar to avoid overlap of text.
There are two problems:
1> for DrawElementsUShortPrimitiveType (and UInt) the source_pindex still equals -1 and causes a crash
in DrawElementsUBytePrimitiveType source_pindex is incremented, and in DrawElementsU(Short/Int)PrimitiveType primitiveNum is incremented, but never used
2> The drawelements need to be rewritten as the vertices are reordered.
created a patch for osg stable branch(r14038): attached as Geometry-osg-3.2.zip
and for svn brach(r14044): attached as Geometry_osg_svn.zip"
This can lead to inconsistency if you bind a framebuffer with multiple attachments in DRAW mode and then a framebuffer with different attachment count in READ mode (for example to manually "blit" from a FBo to another).
On some ATI cards (at least RADEON HD) this also leads to an "incomplete " FBO status
I've added a test to enable drawbuffers only if target is "DRAW" or "READ_DRAW", this solves my problems on ATI cards."
* forwarded touch-events do have a correct input-range from 0 .. 1
* I refactored sending touch-events per osc so the receiver can detect a TOUCH_ENDED better"
One solution is naturally to create a new class that would inherit the osg::ComputeBoundVisitor, and use that. I don't like that idea as the ComputeBoundVisitor does actually have what I need - it is only hidden in a protected function.
I am therefor suggesting a slight generalization of the ComputeBoundVisitor with the attached patch, which is tested.
The patch has two parts:
we add applyBBox() so that one can use that in a customized traverse-function and add a bbox to the visitor. I considered calling this function expandByBBox(), but I though applyBBox was better.
The MatrixStack is made available to the outside world. That enables a traverse-function to do whatever it wishes.
I do actually only need one of the two, as I can implement what I wish either way, but adding getMatrixStack() will make more generic expansions possible.
"
From Robert Osfield, changed the name of the new applyBBox(..) method to applyBoundingBox(..) to keep it's naming more consistent with the rest of the OSG.
