With gcc 4.6.3 it's possible to get the following error:
$ make
gcc -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -fPIC -O2 -MD -MT pridump.o -MF .pridump.o.d -MP -c -o pridump.o pridump.c
pridump.c: In function \u2018pri_bridge\u2019:
pridump.c:117:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make: *** [pridump.o] Error 1
Changing the function return value to void fixes the issue since there
were no places in the code that used the return value.
(closes issue PRI-143)
Reported by: Birger "WIMPy" Harzenetter
Patches:
0001-Fix-no-return-statement-in-function-returning-non-vo.patch (license #5417) patch uploaded by Shaun Ruffell
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.4@2298 2fbb986a-6c06-0410-b554-c9c1f0a7f128
Since the TE side can pick CR values independently, the TE CR needs to be
qualified by TEI to distinguish CR values from other devices. Without
doing this, multiple phones on the BRI line will have intermittent call
failures.
JIRA LIBPRI-30
Also eliminated some wierdness in q931_status() and several places where
it is called.
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.4@1630 2fbb986a-6c06-0410-b554-c9c1f0a7f128
Richard Mudgett