Merged revisions 460 via svnmerge from
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.2 ........ r460 | mattf | 2007-09-06 10:06:42 -0500 (Thu, 06 Sep 2007) | 1 line TBCT now works. It should work for NI2, 4E, and 5E. This code was tested on NI2. ........ git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.4@462 2fbb986a-6c06-0410-b554-c9c1f0a7f128
This commit is contained in:
parent
ac51a8e058
commit
e498bef21f
32
pri.c
32
pri.c
@ -529,22 +529,36 @@ int pri_channel_bridge(q931_call *call1, q931_call *call2)
|
||||
if (!call1 || !call2)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure we have compatible switchtypes */
|
||||
if (call1->pri->switchtype != call2->pri->switchtype)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for bearer capability */
|
||||
if (call1->transcapability != call2->transcapability)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
/* Check to see if calls are on the same PRI dchannel
|
||||
* Currently only support calls on the same dchannel
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check to see if we're on the same PRI */
|
||||
if (call1->pri != call2->pri)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (call1->pri->switchtype == PRI_SWITCH_LUCENT5E)
|
||||
return eect_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2);
|
||||
|
||||
if (call1->pri->switchtype == PRI_SWITCH_DMS100)
|
||||
return rlt_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2);
|
||||
|
||||
switch (call1->pri->switchtype) {
|
||||
case PRI_SWITCH_NI2:
|
||||
case PRI_SWITCH_LUCENT5E:
|
||||
case PRI_SWITCH_ATT4ESS:
|
||||
if (eect_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case PRI_SWITCH_DMS100:
|
||||
if (rlt_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int pri_hangup(struct pri *pri, q931_call *call, int cause)
|
||||
|
@ -1081,13 +1081,10 @@ int mwi_message_send(struct pri* pri, q931_call *call, struct pri_sr *req, int a
|
||||
/* EECT functions */
|
||||
int eect_initiate_transfer(struct pri *pri, q931_call *c1, q931_call *c2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Did all the tests to see if we're on the same PRI and
|
||||
* are on a compatible switchtype */
|
||||
/* TODO */
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
int res = 0;
|
||||
unsigned char buffer[255] = "";
|
||||
unsigned short call_reference = c2->cr;
|
||||
short call_reference = c2->cr ^ 0x8000; /* Let's do the trickery to make sure the flag is correct */
|
||||
struct rose_component *comp = NULL, *compstk[10];
|
||||
int compsp = 0;
|
||||
static unsigned char op_tag[] = {
|
||||
@ -1100,16 +1097,7 @@ int eect_initiate_transfer(struct pri *pri, q931_call *c1, q931_call *c2)
|
||||
0x08,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
buffer[i++] = (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | Q932_PROTOCOL_EXTENSIONS);
|
||||
/* Interpretation component */
|
||||
|
||||
ASN1_ADD_SIMPLE(comp, COMP_TYPE_NFE, buffer, i);
|
||||
ASN1_PUSH(compstk, compsp, comp);
|
||||
ASN1_ADD_BYTECOMP(comp, (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | ASN1_TAG_0), buffer, i, 0);
|
||||
ASN1_ADD_BYTECOMP(comp, (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | ASN1_TAG_2), buffer, i, 0);
|
||||
ASN1_FIXUP(compstk, compsp, buffer, i);
|
||||
|
||||
ASN1_ADD_BYTECOMP(comp, COMP_TYPE_INTERPRETATION, buffer, i, 0);
|
||||
buffer[i++] = (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | Q932_PROTOCOL_ROSE);
|
||||
|
||||
ASN1_ADD_SIMPLE(comp, COMP_TYPE_INVOKE, buffer, i);
|
||||
ASN1_PUSH(compstk, compsp, comp);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user