rename API call and option (nothing has been released to use it yet so this should be safe) to be more accurate in describing what it does

(closes issue #13042)



git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.4@589 2fbb986a-6c06-0410-b554-c9c1f0a7f128
This commit is contained in:
Kevin P. Fleming 2008-07-22 19:43:26 +00:00
parent 8c5da8a278
commit 16719a5f74
4 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ int pri_progress(struct pri *pri, q931_call *c, int channel, int info);
int pri_proceeding(struct pri *pri, q931_call *c, int channel, int info);
/* Enable inband progress when a RELEASE is received */
void pri_set_inbandrelease(struct pri *pri, unsigned int enable);
void pri_set_inbanddisconnect(struct pri *pri, unsigned int enable);
/* Enslave a PRI to another, so they share the same call list
(and maybe some timers) */

4
pri.c
View File

@ -782,9 +782,9 @@ void pri_set_overlapdial(struct pri *pri,int state)
pri->overlapdial = state;
}
void pri_set_inbandrelease(struct pri *pri, unsigned int enable)
void pri_set_inbanddisconnect(struct pri *pri, unsigned int enable)
{
pri->acceptinbandrelease = (enable != 0);
pri->acceptinbanddisconnect = (enable != 0);
}
int pri_fd(struct pri *pri)

View File

@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct pri {
int tei;
int protodisc;
unsigned int bri:1;
unsigned int acceptinbandrelease:1; /* Should we allow inband progress after RELEASE? */
unsigned int acceptinbanddisconnect:1; /* Should we allow inband progress after RELEASE? */
/* Q.921 State */
int q921_state;

2
q931.c
View File

@ -3782,7 +3782,7 @@ int q931_receive(struct pri *pri, q931_h *h, int len)
/* wait for a RELEASE so that sufficient time has passed
for the inband audio to be heard */
if (pri->acceptinbandrelease && (c->progressmask & PRI_PROG_INBAND_AVAILABLE))
if (pri->acceptinbanddisconnect && (c->progressmask & PRI_PROG_INBAND_AVAILABLE))
break;
/* Return such an event */