Otherwise figuring out what's wrong with your JSON can be tricky,
especially if you're using a single fmt string to validate a large,
complicated schema.
The comma delimiting will make separating keys that contain commas
difficult. For example:
{"foo, bar": true, "baz": false}
will generate errors like:
2 object item(s) left unpacked: foo, bar, baz
but that seems like a small enough corner case to not be worth much
worrying.
I wanted to find a way to handle this without have_unrecognized_keys,
but the strbuffer tooling makes it look like I shouldn't be reaching
in to do things like:
strbuffer_t unrecognized_keys;
unrecognized_keys.value = NULL;
and then using 'unrecognized_keys.value == NULL' in place of
have_unrecognized_keys.
This is particularly useful in modular situations where the allocation
functions are either unknown or private. For instance, in such cases,
the caller of json_dumps() has no way to free the returned buffer.
This has the consequence that numbers are never converted to integers
when JSON_DECODE_INT_AS_REAL is set, and thus it works correctly all
integers that are representable as double.
Fixes#212.
On unpack, one may want to mix `JSON_STRICT` and optional keys by using
a format like `{s:i,s?o!}`. Unfortunately, this fails the stric test
with `-1 object item(s) left unpacked` error when the second key is not
specified.
To fix that, we iter on each key and we check if we have successfully
unpacked them. This is less efficient than the previous method but it
brings correctness.
This is because it's really easy to get a name collission if compiling
Jansson as a subproject in a larger CMake project. If one project includes
several subprojects each having their own config.h, this will cause the
wrong file to be loaded.
Only run the imprecision part if json_int_t is long long, otherwise
the imprecision cannot be tested against json_int_t.
Also, convert the double value to json_int_t before checking the
imprecision, because otherwise the json_int_t is converted to double
and the imprecision happens in the "wrong direction".
In the "/* perform the same update again */" area the error
message should be "unable to update an non-empty object"
instead of "unable to update an empty object".
Signed-off-by: Andrei Epure <epure.andrei@gmail.com>
