a017f39fc4
Since pseudo channels are without spans and we would like to use the span list to enumerate through all the channels, keeping the psuedo channels on their own list is required. I believe this is a more natural choice than making a dummy spans for pseudos since pseudo channels should *really* just be an implementation detail that the user shouldn't care about. Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/905/ Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com> git-svn-id: http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/dahdi/linux/trunk@9383 a0bf4364-ded3-4de4-8d8a-66a801d63aff |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
dahdi |