Video streams can be sorted by voice floor activity in the client according to FreeSWITCH´s floor events. The feature works together with pagination, essentially giving an Last-N like experience while not disrupting too much
Made video stream sorting extensible in a way. The sorting modes for pagination and unbounded can be configured in settings.yml and new sorting modes can be added to the stream sorting util under video-provider. Inline docs explain how to do that
Changed how the stream ID attribute from video-streams collection was passed to downstream components; we had an array map that was executed every change just to map stream to cameraId, which is bizarre. So I changed the cameraId usage in downstream components to be conformat with the collection attributes and shaved off the map where it wasnt needed
Add better selectors to video-list-item container´s VoiceUser fetch
- Removed the connection-status history from the user list's gear
icon and now is opened by the connection-status button. Moderators will
render the same modal as before and viewers will only have access to their
own data.
- Added data-savings shortcut at the connection-status modal.
- Added websocket round-trip time.
Modified the previous implementation of the whiteboard individual access to remove
multiple Collections dependency on this feature. Multi-user whiteboard is now an
array instead of a boolean value and most of the access control can be synchronized
and handled by akka-apps.
New config called paginationThreshold defines classes of page sizes that depend on the number of participants of a meeting
The rationale is pretty much the same as the cameraQualityThresholds, but the thresholds are users here and the ceilings are the page sizes
Moderators are able to send a message to the meeting's guest lobby. This new
event reaches bbb-web and is sent to the guest user with her/his status response
while polling. All guest users that are waiting for acceptance will be able to
read this message.
enableGuestLobbyMessage is disabled by default.
Both debounce or throttle could be used to prevent a spammer from
annoying the moderators.
With debounce, a spammer won't even be noticed by the mods, but
there won't be new notifications for legit guests during the spam.
With throttle, a spammer could still annoy the mods, we would only make
the interval between notifications bigger.
It is a tradeoff. An ideal solution would be preventing spamming from
the same user, but probably unnecessarily complex.
